🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.